These files contain the data recorded from a mesocosm experiment conducted in Bergen, Norway 2022 which assessed the effect of simualted mineral-based (silicate or calcium) ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) on diatom silicification. Ten mesocosms were used in total, divided into two groups either the silicate- or calcium based group and alkalinity was increased by either 0, 150, 300, 450 or 600 µmol L-1 above natrually occuring levels. The PDMPO-fluorescence (an appropriate proxy for silicification) of diatoms was recorded on eight seperate days during the experiment. Accompanying data includes measured; macronutrients (nitrate, nitrite, phophate, silicate), total alkalinity, biogenic silica in the water column and sediment trap.

This data package consists of two files to accompany the manuscript Smith J., Flukes E., Keane J.P. (2024) The risky nightlife of undersized sea urchins. Marine and Freshwater Research IN PRESS. Dataset A: 211 Centrostephanus rodgersii (longspined sea urchin) were measured for test diameter and spine canopy at Fortescue Bay, Tasmania, Australia in May-June 2023 (FB_TD_SC.csv) Dataset B: Urchin movement data from Flukes et al. 2023 and associated urchin sizes measured in this study (whole_measured_df.csv)

Data to accompany publication on wild diet of southern rock lobster on the east coast of Tasmania. In this study we collected 64 lobsters and analysed the diet of each individual using stomach contents, stable isotope analysis and DNA identification of prey species in faecal samples.

Ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) is an emerging carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategy that leverages the natural processes of weathering and acid neutralisation to durably store atmospheric CO2 in seawater. OAE can be achieved with a variety of methods, all of which have different environmental implications. One widely considered method utilizes electrochemistry to remove strong acid from seawater, leaving sodium hydroxide (NaOH) behind. This study evaluates the impacts of OAE via NaOH (NaOH-OAE) on a coastal plankton bloom, with particular focus on how macronutrient regeneration in the aftermath of the bloom responds to the perturbation. To investigate this, we enclosed a natural coastal phytoplankton community, including coccolithophores, in nine microcosms. The microcosms were divided into three groups: control, unequilibrated (512.1 ± 2.5 µmol kg-1 alkalinity increase) and equilibrated (499.3 ±5.65 µmol kg-1 alkalinity increase). Light was provided for 11 days to stimulate a bloom (light phase) and lights were turned off thereafter to investigate alkalinity and nutrient changes for 21 days (dark phase). We found no detectable effect of equilibrated NaOH-OAE on phytoplankton community and bacteria abundances determined with flow cytometry but observed a small yet detectable restructuring of phytoplankton communities under unequilibrated conditions. NaOH-OAE had no significant effect on alkalinity, NOx- and phosphate regeneration, but increased silicate regeneration by 64% over 21 days under darkness in the unequilibrated treatments where seawater pH was highest (8.65 relative to 7.92 in the control). Additional dissolution experiments with two diatom species supported this outcome on silicate regeneration for one of the two species, thereby suggesting that the effect is species specific. Our results point towards the potential of NaOH-OAE to influence regeneration of silicate in the surface ocean and thus the growth of diatoms, at least under the very extreme NaOH-OAE conditions simulated here.

This dataset contains the input and output data for an extended optimum multiparameter analysis (eOMP). Input data for parameters are given (temperature, salinity, oxygen, nitrate, phosphate and silicate), as obtained from the cited CSIRO open access CTD bottle data for the 2018 SR3 occupation. Output parameters are the proportional contribution of 8 water masses that were defined in the eOMP analysis. The output remineralization estimate, Delta-O, is also given. All data are referenced to depth and geographical position (latitude, longitude) from corresponding CTD bottle data. The eOMP used here was configured following Pardo et al. (2017). Details on the equations, parameterization and end-members that characterize the regional oceanography can also be found in the Supplementary Materials of Traill et al. (2023), including the robustness of the OMP analysis and the uncertainties of both the SWTs’ contributions and the ΔO parameter (Sections S1.2 and S1.3, Table S1, Table S2, Table S3).

This submission creates a static snapshot of data from the Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) and stereo-BRUV annotation data from the National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Elizabeth and Middleton Reef survey. More details on the survey can be found at https://www.nespmarine.edu.au/document/elizabeth-and-middleton-reefs-lord-howe-marine-park-post-survey-report.

We compare the formulation and emergent dynamics of 11 CMIP6 IPCC marine biogeochemical models. We find that the largest source of uncertainty across model simulations of marine carbon cycling is grazing pressure (i.e. the phytoplankton specific loss rate to grazing). Variability in grazing pressure is driven by large differences in zooplankton specific grazing rates, which are not sufficiently compensated for by offsetting differences in zooplankton specific mortality rates. Models instead must tune the turnover rate of the phytoplankton population to balance large differences in top-down grazing pressure and constrain net primary production. We then run a controlled sensitivity experiment in a global, coupled ocean-biogeochemistry model to test the sensitivity of marine carbon cycling to this uncertainty and find that even when tuned to identical net primary production, export and secondary production remain extremely sensitive to grazing, likely biasing predictions of future climate states and food security.