IMAS Metadata Catalogue
Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons (NESP MaC 1.17)
Decision makers seek to account for the socioeconomic values of environmental assets. However, understanding the available frameworks and data can be a barrier. We address this here by summarizing the data used across four case studies (3 geographic regions and 3 socio-economic value frameworks) to demonstrate what data are available and how they are applied to support decisions in varied contexts.
Simple
Identification info
- Date (Creation)
- 2022-03-29
Principal investigator
College of Business, Law & Governance, James Cook University (JCU) - Jarvis, Diane
James Cook University
Townsville
Queensland
4811
Australia
Principal investigator
School of Geography, Planning, and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania (UTAS) - Adams, Vanessa
Private Bag 78
Hobart
Tasmania
7001
Australia
- Credit
- National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Marine and Coastal Hub
- Status
- complete
Point of contact
School of Geography, Planning, and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania (UTAS) - Adams, Vanessa
Private Bag 78
Hobart
Tasmania
7001
Australia
- Topic category
-
- Oceans
N
S
E
W
))
N
S
E
W
))
N
S
E
W
))
Temporal extent
- Time period
- 2021-10-01 2022-03-31
- Maintenance and update frequency
- none-planned
Resource format
- Date
- Keywords (Theme)
-
- values
- System of Environmental Economic Accounting Ecosystem Accounts(SEEA EA)
- ecosystem services
- total economic value (TEV)
- NASA/GCMD Keywords, Version 8.5
Resource constraints
- Other constraints
- This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of NESP Marine and Coastal Hub Project 1.17.
Resource constraints
- Classification
- Unclassified
Resource constraints
- Use limitation
- Data was sourced from the NESP Marine and Coastal Hub – the Marine and Coastal Hub is supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP), administered by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE).
Resource constraints
- Linkage
-
http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png
License Graphic
- Title
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- Website
-
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License Text
- Other constraints
- The citation in a list of references is: Adams, V. & Jarvis, D. (2022), Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons. University of Tasmania. Data accessed at https://metadata.imas.utas.edu.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/uuid=4fca5250-7381-4a09-b02d-4b7347c495a5 on [access date].
- Language
- English
- Character encoding
- UTF8
Distribution Information
- Distribution format
-
- OnLine resource
- DATA ACCESS - table of data records for case studies [PDF]
Resource lineage
- Statement
- We conducted workshops with key research users in the marine environment to identify key decision making questions and regions of interest for them. These workshops were hosted October – November 2021 with participants from 9 difference commonwealth agencies with a management stake in the marine environment. The decision making contexts identified were: • I need to implement a social and economic monitoring program for an area of marine estate • I need to make a choice between potential management actions • I need a shift to more pro-environmental behaviours Furthermore, when asked where participants were working a number of locations were identified including: • The economic exclusive zone • The national marine protected area estate • The Great Barrier Reef • Geographe Marine Park • Port Philip Bay • Partnership programs and sites such as Reef Builder sites along the east coast of Australia and restoration sites in Gulf St Vincent. As a result of the workshops we selected Geographe Marine Park Environmental Accounts, Port Philip Bay Environmental Accounts, and Great Barrier Reef Total Economic Value studies as case studies. For each case study we began with the source documents and sites provided to us by workshop participants. Within these main reports and source documents we recorded each type of data used and found any available links to original source data. This data record provides a summary of each case study breaking down data considered by type (assets, condition, services, benefits) and provides interpretations of data considered and links to the original data inputs.
- Hierarchy level
- Dataset
mdb:MD_Metadata
- Metadata identifier
- 4fca5250-7381-4a09-b02d-4b7347c495a5
- Language
- English
- Character encoding
- UTF8
Point of contact
- Parent metadata
Type of resource
- Resource scope
- Dataset
- Metadata linkage
-
https://metadata.imas.utas.edu.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/uuid=4fca5250-7381-4a09-b02d-4b7347c495a5
Point of truth URL of this metadata record
- Date info (Creation)
- 2015-05-06T11:44:25
- Date info (Revision)
- 2015-05-06T11:44:25
Metadata standard
- Title
- ISO 19115-3:2018
Overviews
Spatial extent
N
S
E
W
N
S
E
W
N
S
E
W
Provided by
Associated resources
Not available