IMAS Metadata Catalogue
IND341 - Healthcheck: Effectiveness of management regimes
Metric: A score of the effectiveness of management regimes in place based on recency, frequency of review, and the inclusion of measurable performance indicators.
Measures how well management systems perform based on factors such as regular reviews, current information, and clear performance targets.
Simple
Identification info
- Date (Publication)
- 2026-07-03T00:00:00
Principal investigator
Principal investigator
- Credit
- The continuation of Australian Fisheries Healthcheck has been supported by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) on behalf of the Australian Government (Project 2023-024) and the DAFF Ag Traceability Uplift – Responsible fisheries – Activating a comprehensive Ecological, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting data system to uplift sustainability traceability. The project ran from 2023-2026.
- Status
- On going
- Topic category
-
- Economy
- Society
- Farming
- Environment
Extent
Temporal extent
- Time period
- 2025-01-01
- Maintenance and update frequency
- Quarterly
- Keywords (Theme)
-
- Governance
- Keywords (Sub-Topic Category)
-
- Effectiveness
- Global Change Master Directory Earth Science Keywords, Version 8.5
Resource constraints
- Linkage
-
http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png
License Graphic
- Title
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- Website
-
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License Text
- Other constraints
- Cite data as: Hobday, A. & Ogier, E. (2025) Healthcheck Sustainability Indicator Reporting for Australian Fisheries. CSIRO. Data accessed from https://metadata.imas.utas.edu.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/570c389c-6c00-4edf-8aed-8c49a5b4547d on [access date]
- Other constraints
- Please also cite the associated project report: Hobday, A., Ogier, E., Thomas, L., Spanou, E., Walsh, P., Fleming, A., Jumppanen, P., Hartog, J., Flukes, E., Bustamante, R., Deng, R., Rochester, W., Kenyon, R. (2026) Healthcheck3 - Activating a comprehensive ESG reporting data system to uplift sustainability traceability. Prepared for the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC project 2023/024) and Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Australian Government (National Agricultural Traceability Grants Program (Grant ID 4-IMHI4L3). CSIRO, Hobart, Australia.
- Language
- English
- Character encoding
- UTF8
Distribution Information
- Distribution format
-
- CSV
- OnLine resource
- Data for IND341 - Effectiveness of management regimes
Resource lineage
- Statement
- Step 1: Determine whether a formal management plan or other type of less formal management regime is in place for the fishery. If no plan/regime is found, report "Management regime not found" and the year of data collection for the framework. Step 2: If a plan or regime is found: - Identify the most recent date of review. If the plan/regime was last reviewed in the past year, assign a score of 3/3. If the plan/regime was last reviewed in the past 5 years, assign a score of 2/3. If the plan/regime was last reviewed over 5 years ago, assign a score of 1/3. If the plan/regime has never been reviewed, assign a score of 0/3. If information regarding plan review is thought to be missing (i.e. the plan is known to have been reviewed but information regarding review dates cannot be found), assign a score of 0/0. - Identify the frequency of review. If the plan/regime is reviewed once every 1-3 years, assign a score of 3/3. If the plan/regime is reviewed once every 4-6 years, assign a score of 2/3. If the plan/regime is reviewed once every 7+ years, assign a score of 1/3. If the plan/regime has never been reviewed, assign a score of 0/3. If information regarding plan review is thought to be missing (i.e. the plan is known to have been reviewed but information regarding review dates cannot be found), assign a score of 0/0. - Determine whether the plan/regime contains defined and measurable performance indicators. If the plan/regime includes four or more indicators, assign a score of 3/3. If the plan includes two or three indicators, assign a score of 2/3. If the plan includes one indicator, assign a score of 1/3. If the plan does not include any defined and measurable performance indicators, assign a score of 0/3. Step 3: Sum the values obtained to calculate an effectiveness score in the form of a fraction (x/y, where x is the total score and y represents the total possible score based on which criteria could be scored. y should be between 3 and 9.) Step 4: Report the calculated score in the form of a fraction (x/y) and the management regime's year of publication where available. Note: Some elements of this composite score may need to be manually obtained.
- Hierarchy level
- Dataset
- Hierarchy level
- Dataset
Metadata
- Metadata identifier
- urn:uuid/4b1dc636-76a6-479a-8fe3-ccfdba81dd0f
- Language
- English
- Character encoding
- UTF8
Type of resource
- Resource scope
- Dataset
- Name
- Healthcheck Indicator record
- Metadata linkage
-
https://metadata.imas.utas.edu.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/4b1dc636-76a6-479a-8fe3-ccfdba81dd0f
Point of truth URL of this metadata record
- Date info (Creation)
- 2025-08-10T00:00:00
- Date info (Revision)
- 2026-07-03T16:13:21
Metadata standard
- Title
- ISO 19115-3:2018
Overviews
Fisheries Healthcheck logo
Spatial extent
Provided by
Associated resources
Not available